00:39 (join) jonrafkind 02:14 (quit) rbarraud: Read error: Operation timed out 02:15 (join) rbarraud 03:16 (quit) emma: Ping timeout: 240 seconds 03:20 (quit) jonrafkind: Ping timeout: 276 seconds 04:01 (quit) hanDerPeder: Quit: hanDerPeder 04:38 (join) hanDerPeder 05:45 (quit) rbarraud: Ping timeout: 252 seconds 06:04 (join) rbarraud 07:17 (join) emma 07:43 (quit) rbarraud: Ping timeout: 240 seconds 09:19 (join) b-man_ 09:49 (join) fjl 10:07 (quit) fjl: Quit: Leaving. 10:26 (join) samth 10:55 (join) asumu 11:21 (quit) asumu: Ping timeout: 258 seconds 11:30 (join) asumu 11:59 (quit) hanDerPeder: Quit: hanDerPeder 12:33 (join) jonrafkind 12:34 (join) hanDerPeder 12:56 (join) hanDerPeder_ 12:57 (quit) hanDerPeder: Ping timeout: 272 seconds 12:57 (nick) hanDerPeder_ -> hanDerPeder 13:19 (quit) hanDerPeder: Quit: hanDerPeder 13:21 (join) anRch 13:34 askhader: rudybot: (display 1) 13:34 rudybot: askhader: that means do not display the "Wrote file" message. 13:56 (join) carleastlund 14:17 (join) Sizur 14:18 Sizur: hi guys! you are doing amazing work! 14:18 Sizur: quick question. i'm new to racket and just saw datalog and racklog. what's the difference between the two? 14:29 samth: racklog is an embedding of full prolog-style backtracking in racket 14:29 samth: datalog is a restricted language 14:32 Sizur: racklog superset of datalog? 14:32 samth: sort of 14:32 Sizur: i mean anything you can do with datalog, racklog can do 14:33 Sizur: or is there a usecase of datalog over racklog? 14:33 samth: yes 14:33 samth: first, you can implement datalog differently 14:34 samth: second, it can be easier to understand programs written in a more restricted system 14:34 samth: see the "principle of least power" 14:34 Sizur: for someone who is comfortable with prolog already 14:40 samth: datalog is just a subset of prolog 14:40 samth: so you should already be comfortable with both 14:40 Sizur: i'm reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_Least_Power and his definition of powerfull is quite interesting... i like your description of less constraint better 14:41 Sizur: your less restricted = Tim's more powerfull it seems 14:42 Sizur: but it doesnt really flow in his case. haskell being an example of a very constrainted system yet arguably more powerfull because is more expressive than c++ 14:44 Sizur: another option is that i have no clue of what i'm talking about 14:50 samth: haskell is in some ways more constrained than c++ 14:50 samth: you can't muck with random parts of memory 14:50 samth: and you in fact shouldn't use languages where you can do such things unless you need to 14:51 samth: in most senses though, haskell is in the same class as c++ 14:52 (quit) jonrafkind: Quit: Ex-Chat 14:53 (join) jonrafkind 14:55 samth: jonrafkind, is ryan around? 14:55 jonrafkind: let me see 14:56 jonrafkind: not here 14:56 samth: darn 15:05 (quit) anRch: Quit: anRch 15:12 Sizur: this is just so great! make, prolog, macros, all in one 15:21 (quit) b-man_: Ping timeout: 240 seconds 15:50 jay-mccarthy: Sizur: re datalog. datalog is guaranteed to evaluate in polynomial time 15:50 jay-mccarthy: all the restrictions are to enable that guarantee 15:50 jay-mccarthy: THAT is why you choose it rather than prolog. 15:51 jay-mccarthy: my default is to try to use datalog, then escape out if i have to 16:17 (join) hanDerPeder_ 17:02 (quit) tcoppi: Ping timeout: 276 seconds 17:04 (join) tcoppi_ 17:05 (join) b-man_ 17:05 (nick) tcoppi_ -> tcoppi 17:06 (join) Dave920 17:06 Dave920: Hi, someone can tell me how to run ProfessorJ on racket please? 17:06 (join) joshbronson 17:07 Dave920: i can't in find it in "Choose language" 17:08 samth: ProfessorJ is no longer distributed with Racket 17:08 samth: i believe that it's available from planet.racket-lang.org 17:08 samth: but i'm not certain 17:09 jonrafkind: doesnt look like its there 17:09 (quit) joshbronson: Client Quit 17:09 Dave920: i can't find it 17:10 Dave920: uhm, it's possibile to find an old versione of DrScheme with ProfessorJ? 17:10 Dave920: *version 17:12 Dave920: yes it's possibile 17:13 jonrafkind nods 17:14 (quit) hanDerPeder_: Quit: hanDerPeder_ 17:14 Dave920: i said too much earlier 17:17 Dave920: noone knows? 17:19 jay-mccarthy: Dave920: I think jonrafkind said yes 17:21 Dave920: ah ok, i don't know what "nods" means 17:21 jonrafkind: you said "yes it's possible" so i was agreeing with you 17:21 jonrafkind: what did you mean by "yes it's possible" ? 17:21 carleastlund: Versions of Racket and PLT Scheme going back many years are all available online. 17:22 Dave920: jonrafkind i said "yes it's possible" but i was wrong, or better i have not find them 17:22 Dave920: carleastlund do you know where? 17:23 samth: http://download.plt-scheme.org/drscheme/all-versions.html 17:23 carleastlund: Sam beat me to it. 17:24 Dave920: oh.. i have not see "other versions" :||| 17:24 Dave920: thank you all ^^ 17:25 Dave920: Bye 17:25 (quit) Dave920: 17:26 jonrafkind: probably professorj should go on planet 17:29 samth: yes, that was the plan 17:29 samth: it just hasn't happened yet 17:30 (quit) asumu: Ping timeout: 272 seconds 18:05 (join) asumu 18:13 (quit) b-man_: Ping timeout: 252 seconds 18:14 (join) b-man_ 19:13 (quit) asumu: Ping timeout: 276 seconds 19:48 (join) rbarraud 20:11 (quit) adadglgmut: Max SendQ exceeded 20:12 (join) adadglgmut 20:18 (quit) jonrafkind: Ping timeout: 240 seconds 20:27 (quit) carleastlund: Quit: carleastlund 20:30 (join) jao 20:33 (join) asumu 21:41 (quit) adadglgmut: Quit: Leaving 21:41 (join) offby1 21:41 (join) adadglgmut 23:37 (quit) b-man_: Remote host closed the connection