00:47 (quit) RyanRN: Quit: Leaving.
01:54 (quit) jonrafkind: Ping timeout: 246 seconds
02:11 (join) rbarraud_
02:14 (quit) rbarraud: Ping timeout: 276 seconds
03:08 (quit) rbarraud_: Read error: Operation timed out
03:13 (join) rbarraud_
03:55 (join) masm
05:10 (join) spidermario
05:25 (quit) rbarraud_: Read error: Connection reset by peer
05:51 (join) dzhus
06:29 (quit) dzhus: Remote host closed the connection
07:59 (join) rbarraud
08:08 (join) RyanRN
08:12 (quit) RyanRN: Ping timeout: 265 seconds
08:24 (quit) Baughn: Ping timeout: 248 seconds
08:31 (join) Baughn
08:37 (join) hanDerPeder
08:39 (quit) rbarraud: Ping timeout: 252 seconds
09:12 (quit) masm: Ping timeout: 260 seconds
09:27 (join) masm
09:35 (quit) hanDerPeder: Quit: hanDerPeder
09:56 (join) anRch
09:56 (join) hanDerPeder
10:49 (quit) anRch: Quit: anRch
11:27 (join) b-man_
11:37 (join) rpr
11:38 rpr: define-syntax does not work in #lang racket/base or should it? http://gist.github.com/524411
11:44 chandler: rpr: You need to import `racket/base' into the phase-1 environment as well, like so: (require (for-syntax racket/base))
11:52 rpr: I consider as much by its the broken symmetry here.  #lang racket/base defines only at level 0 but it appears #lang racket is autodefined at the macro (phase 1 level).
11:54 rpr: Similar oddity with contracts.
12:55 chandler: Yes, `racket' is a utility module that's supposed to act as a "one stop shop". The more granular modules like `racket/base' don't export their bindings at phase 1, only at phase 0, because (if I had to guess at the motivation) presumably you want to be more careful about what bindings are imported when using those.
13:02 (quit) b-man_: Remote host closed the connection
13:27 Lajla: chandler, let's code an RTS superior to Starcraft in racket, you and I, partners for life, we just need to find a way to communicate to each other
15:00 rpr: chandler: I can live with that.  Thanks.
15:00 (quit) rpr: Quit: Pool time.
15:16 (join) evhan
15:17 evhan: i
15:19 evhan: i'm running into a strange problem -- is there anything inherently wrong with using racket to load (via ffi/unsafe) a C library in which racket has been embedded?
15:19 evhan: the error i'm getting reads "GC_init_type_tags should only be called once!
15:28 (quit) evhan: Read error: Connection reset by peer
15:29 (join) evhan
16:30 (quit) evhan: Read error: Connection reset by peer
17:05 (join) evhan
17:09 (quit) spidermario: Remote host closed the connection
17:13 (join) jonrafkind
18:11 (join) rmitt
18:11 rmitt: anyone awake to answer a read-char question?
18:14 rmitt: here goes: does anyone know how to use read-char to read characters from stdin directly, without needing a newline/carriage-return?
18:16 (quit) rmitt: Quit: Page closed
18:24 (quit) jao: Remote host closed the connection
18:43 (join) jao
18:55 tewk: evhan: you seem to be starting a second scheme runtime.  I don't think that is supported.
19:01 (join) b-man
19:01 (nick) b-man -> Guest1580
19:04 offby1: You seem to be writing a suicide note.  Would you like to see a list of suggested weapons?
19:08 Lajla: Ahahaha
19:08 Lajla: offby1, where did you got that one?
19:09 offby1: I heard it somewhere.  But I Googled before writing that, hoping to find the canonical wording, and found almost nothing
19:09 Lajla: offby1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yX8yrOAjfKM
19:09 offby1: So I made up the "list of suggested weapons" bit.
19:10 offby1: Lajla: sorry, I stopped watching after the ad started.
19:11 Lajla: offby1, oh blast, youtube put them in front of it
19:11 Lajla: It's basically a spoof, the matrix running on Windows XP
19:11 Lajla: 'It looks like you're trying to bend a spoon with your mind, want some help'
19:12 offby1: :)
19:22 evhan: tewk: yeah, i'm going to play with the source and see how badly things crash and burn
19:23 evhan: although wrapping C on both sides in racket just sounds like so much fun
19:28 evhan: i dont suppose theres a way to isolate the two instances? two separate runtimes, two separate GCs?
19:29 evhan: that seems to be the only bit where racket complains...
19:33 (quit) masm: Quit: Leaving.
19:39 (join) pavelludiq
19:39 (quit) pavelludiq: Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)
20:03 (join) evhan_
20:06 (quit) evhan: Ping timeout: 248 seconds
20:47 (nick) evhan_ -> evhan
21:09 (join) rbarraud
21:15 (join) SinDoc
21:15 (quit) evhan: Ping timeout: 265 seconds
21:16 SinDoc: How can I refresh the page asynchronously in Continue?
21:16 (join) evhan
21:21 (quit) evhan: Ping timeout: 240 seconds
21:23 jonrafkind: i dunno, but with regular javascript you set a timer that reloads the page or whatever
21:24 (join) evhan
21:41 SinDoc: Thanks jonrafkind
21:45 SinDoc: Javascript would work but I prefer that it's on-demand rather than periodic
21:46 SinDoc: Indeed if I'm able to generate an event, then I can capture it in Javascript
21:48 SinDoc: The question that remains though is how can the server have the client send a GET request
21:51 (quit) jao: Ping timeout: 265 seconds
22:40 jonrafkind: im pretty sure you cant, get requests must come from the client
22:44 Lajla: (call-with-current-continuaton jonrafkind)
22:45 jonrafkind: (error 'not-enough-beef "wheres the beef?")
22:45 Lajla: jonrafkind, have you seen the implementation of quote with low level macros
22:45 jonrafkind: hm, i guess not
22:45 jonrafkind: is it awe-inspiring?
22:46 Lajla: jonrafkind, well, it's pretty cool to see that quote et alia are not primitives
22:46 Lajla: http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/quote-as-macro.txt
22:51 SinDoc: jonrafkind: so we should just schedule the page to refresh every now and then using Javascript
22:51 jonrafkind: yea
22:52 SinDoc: We should still be able to talk to the client using XMLHttpObject (?)
22:54 jonrafkind: yea
22:56 SinDoc: Yeah, it should work that way; thanks for the help jonrafkind ;)
22:56 jonrafkind: Lajla, i thought quote did more than that, but i guess it works
22:58 Lajla: jonrafkind, what more then?
22:59 jonrafkind: i mean i guess quote doesnt do anything more than what he showed
23:08 (join) shkk
23:17 Lajla: shkk, en taro adun
23:18 Lajla: jonrafkind, you still don't like da praefix eh?
23:19 jonrafkind: the what
23:19 jonrafkind: are you referring to some wierd naming convention?
23:19 jonrafkind: or prefix expressions
23:20 shkk: Lajla: Didnt understand what you sent
23:20 jonrafkind: its from starcraft
23:21 Lajla: jonrafkind, præfix yes
23:21 Lajla: You will bow for mine archaïc spelling
23:21 jonrafkind: you didnt clarify anything
23:21 jonrafkind: you just repeated the word you said previously
23:21 Lajla: I used a æ now.
23:21 jonrafkind: :p
23:21 Lajla: jonrafkind, praefix is the only acceptable spelling of 'prefix' [sic]
23:22 Lajla: What some people use.
23:28 (quit) shkk: