00:45 (join) Nanakhiel
00:47 (quit) Spewns: Quit: Leaving.
00:48 (quit) Lajla: Ping timeout: 240 seconds
00:57 offby1: rudybot: uptime
00:57 rudybot: offby1: I've been up for two days; this tcp/ip connection has been up for two days
01:02 (join) jtolds
01:05 (quit) jtolds: Client Quit
01:06 (join) jtolds
01:07 (part) jtolds
01:16 (quit) Byron: Ping timeout: 260 seconds
01:42 (quit) faure: Ping timeout: 265 seconds
02:13 (join) faure
02:23 (quit) jonrafkind: Ping timeout: 258 seconds
02:24 (join) masm
03:02 (nick) Nanakhiel -> Lajla
03:33 (join) pdelgallego
04:35 (quit) jao: Ping timeout: 245 seconds
05:25 (join) hanDerPeder
05:42 (join) jao
06:39 (quit) Gwyth: Ping timeout: 276 seconds
07:03 (quit) hellmage: Remote host closed the connection
07:32 (join) kingping
07:32 kingping: Heyas
07:34 kingping: `bytes?` is the same as `bytevector?` ?
07:38 (quit) offby1: *.net *.split
07:38 (quit) spacebat: *.net *.split
07:40 Lajla: kingping, context?
07:40 (join) spacebat
07:40 kingping: Uhm, lemme discover.
07:41 (join) offby1
07:41 kingping: "write-byte  provided from scheme/base, scheme"
07:42 kingping: "bytevector?  provided from rnrs/bytevectors-6"
07:42 kingping: Like this?
07:43 kingping: AFAIK they both represent series of elements each 1 byte long.
07:43 kingping: Moreover (bytes? (with-output-to-bytes (lambda () (write-byte 42) (write-bytes (integer->integer-bytes 65535 2 #f #t)))))
07:43 kingping: and
07:43 kingping: (bytevector? (with-output-to-bytes (lambda () (write-byte 42) (write-bytes (integer->integer-bytes 65535 2 #f #t)))))
07:44 kingping: both return #t
07:45 kingping: (require rnrs/bytevectors-6)
08:00 (quit) mario-goulart: Remote host closed the connection
08:01 (join) mario-goulart
09:05 Lajla: eli, are you following me on stacküberflow perchance?
09:43 (quit) kingping: Quit: I'm off to hit the bedbug. Vale.
10:01 (quit) alexsuraci: Remote host closed the connection
10:03 (join) alexsuraci
10:03 (quit) alexsuraci: Excess Flood
10:31 (quit) offby1: Read error: Connection reset by peer
10:42 (join) offby1
10:45 (join) Spewns
10:59 (nick) samth_away -> samth
11:21 (quit) hanDerPeder: Quit: hanDerPeder
11:31 (join) hanDerPeder_
11:32 (quit) hanDerPeder_: Client Quit
11:33 (join) b-man
11:37 (quit) paul_stansifer: Ping timeout: 252 seconds
11:37 (join) hanDerPeder_
11:38 (quit) pdelgallego: Read error: Connection reset by peer
11:40 (join) paul_stansifer
11:43 (join) jonrafkind
11:49 (nick) hanDerPeder_ -> hanDerPeder
11:55 (quit) hanDerPeder: Quit: hanDerPeder
11:55 (join) anRch
11:55 (join) hanDerPeder
11:56 (quit) hanDerPeder: Client Quit
11:58 samth: chandler, sstrickl and I created this channel
11:58 samth: it mostly runs itself these days
12:03 (join) sstrickl
12:23 (quit) anRch: Quit: anRch
12:28 (join) carleastlund
12:28 (quit) jao: Read error: Operation timed out
12:28 (join) shkk
12:33 (join) anRch
13:02 (quit) anRch: Quit: anRch
13:05 (join) kukka
13:50 (quit) paul_stansifer: Ping timeout: 252 seconds
13:56 (join) jao
14:06 (join) anRch
14:17 (join) paul_stansifer
15:32 (quit) anRch: Quit: anRch
15:45 Lajla: samth, to whom was that directed?
15:46 samth: which?
15:46 Lajla: <samth> chandler, sstrickl and I created this channel
15:46 Lajla: <samth> it mostly runs itself these days
15:46 Lajla: That
15:46 samth: to chandler
15:46 Lajla: Ohhhh
15:46 Lajla: chandler as in the addresse
15:46 Lajla: I thought he also created this channel
15:46 samth: no
18:04 samth: fun error from the zo-test, jay-mccarthy
18:11 jay-mccarthy: i just spent almost 2 hours finding one place where we forgot to use 'apply'
18:11 jay-mccarthy: it's pretty rough
18:13 jay-mccarthy: hopefully it will pay off though
18:28 (quit) sstrickl: Quit: sstrickl
19:25 (quit) masm: Quit: Leaving.
19:29 (join) rbarraud
19:36 (quit) askhader: Quit: Lost terminal
19:55 (join) neilv
19:55 (part) neilv
19:55 (join) neilv
20:06 (nick) samth -> samth_away
21:20 (quit) carleastlund: Quit: carleastlund
22:02 (join) hellmage
22:11 (quit) jonrafkind: Ping timeout: 265 seconds
23:05 (quit) Spewns: Quit: Leaving.
23:21 tewk: How do I pass the address of a pointer using the ffi?  I have a Foo* and func1 wants a Foo**
23:23 (join) Gwyth
23:40 chandler: tewk: Where is this Foo*? If it's in the Racket heap, the answer is "you don't".
23:41 chandler: malloc something external to the Racket heap to hold the Foo*, then pass the address to that.
23:49 (join) jonrafkind